Courts “must make better use of staff and IT” to reduce trial waiting times

July 9, 2009 at 12:10 pm Leave a comment


The Public Affairs Committee has published a report on the performance of the Crown Court system.

In 2007, the Crown Court received from magistrates’ courts 87,000 cases for trial, 40,000 cases for sentencing and 13,000 appeals by defendants.

HM Courts Service, an executive agency of the Ministry of Justice, administers the Crown Court, providing its estate, staff and IT.

In 2007-08, the Service spent around £380 million to operate the Crown Court, including paying for the judges who hear all Crown Court cases.

Under the direction of judges, the Service’s staff allocate dates when cases are to be heard in court (known as listing) and manage the progress of cases to trial.

“HM Courts Service is likely to achieve its overall target for timely commencement of Crown Court cases in 2008-09, which will be the first time since it was established in April 2005,” the committee said.

“The Service will not, however, meet its target for commencing cases committed for trial which arise when a defendant opts to have a case heard in the Crown Court, or magistrates decide that this should happen.

“Performance varies widely across the Service’s 24 areas.

“In 2007-08, the six best performing areas on average commenced 87% of cases committed for Crown Court trial within 16 weeks; the six poorest performing areas began 56% of cases.

“The Service is facing a tight budgetary position and Crown Court workload is forecast to increase until 2011.

“If it is to reduce further the time taken to commence cases and provide a good service in all areas, it must make better use of the Crown Court’s estate, staff and IT.”

The Service is spending £120 million to increase the number of Crown Court rooms by 30 (6%) by 2012.

Despite improvements over the last six years, fewer than half of trials proceed on the day scheduled.

Edward Leigh MP, Chairman of the Committee of Public Accounts, said:

“The Courts Service has got a lot better overall at starting trials at the Crown Court on time but it will miss its target for starting on time those cases which have been committed for trial.

“Performance varies widely across England and Wales: in the six poorest performing areas, such trials began within 16 weeks in only just over a half of cases.

“Long delays to the start of the most serious criminal cases do not serve the cause of justice.

“Against the background of an expected increase in Crown Court workload until 2011 and a cut in its budget, better use must be made of the Crown Court’s estate, staff and IT.

“The Courts Service could do a lot more. It should consider setting local targets for those locations with the longer waiting times.

“Court staff should be trained and supported to be able to deal flexibly with whatever work is to be undertaken at individual courts.

“The Courts Service should also differentiate between cases to identify those which need more preparation time.

“Court staff need efficient user-friendly IT if they are to process cases efficiently and help judges make the best use of court rooms.

“But the Crown Court’s 20 year-old case management system has seen better days.

“If a case is moved from one court to another, then all the information has to be keyed into the system again.

“Improvements to the system’s functionality are sorely needed.”


Entry filed under: Committees, Commons. Tags: , , , , , , .

Cruise ship passengers with ‘vomiting bug’ concern independent MP MPs renew 28 days detention for terrorist suspects

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s

Trackback this post  |  Subscribe to the comments via RSS Feed

Follow us on Twitter!

July 2009
« Jun   Aug »

%d bloggers like this: