Senior MPs call for more powers to scrutinise government spending

July 7, 2009 at 10:37 am Leave a comment

The liaison committee has said the way public expenditure figures for Government programmes for future years are controlled.

The committee, made up of the 32 chairs of the House of Commons Select Committees, said the process much more understandable and useful.

Committee Chairman Alan Williams said:

“Effective monitoring of government expenditure—and ultimately the exercise of effective control over it—is one of the core functions of the House of Commons.

“This function is pursued day in and day out by the House, through inquiry and debate on the policies underlying expenditure, on priorities, and on overall government spending, and through examination by the National Audit Office (NAO) and the Committee of Public Accounts (PAC) of past expenditure.”

The committee said it welcomes the Alignment Project White Paper from the Treasury alongside it own proposals for “additional opportunities to boost the House’s effectiveness.”

In the White Paper the Treasury put forward plans for major reform of the way expenditure figures—the Estimates for the current year which require the approval of the House of Commons—are presented to Parliament.

This would align them more closely with the expenditure plans already published for future years.

The Committee said “overall” it supports the detailed proposals for alignment.

They will:

* make the Government’s requests to Parliament for spending authority easier (though not easy) to understand

* mean that the sums that Parliament approves are on the same basis as those actually used within Government for setting the budgets of each Department.

This will enable better scrutiny by individual Members, by the House’s Select Committees and by other interested parties.

However, it will not in itself deliver better scrutiny and control by the House as a whole.

That will require also more effective procedures for consideration of expenditure proposals on the floor of the House.

The Committee’s Report today therefore proposes that:

* the scope of debate on the days set aside for these matters be broadened to allow genuine examination of future spending plans, allowing proper scrutiny before plans are almost irretrievably firmed up in the Estimates

* two additional days’ debates be set aside for formally debating Estimates and spending plans (in accordance with the Government’s own initiative to provide opportunities for debates on these matters).

While the House scrutinises expenditure all the time – through parliamentary questions, statements, general debates and legislation, and Members are already able to precipitate debates, vote on individual Estimates, and force reductions in Estimates – the Committee considers that the House would benefit from an extension of procedures to provide for wider, but nonetheless focused, opportunities to examine future expenditure plans, as well as current Estimates.


Entry filed under: Committees, Commons. Tags: , , , , , , , , .

10% of NHS patients admitted to hospital “suffer some form of harm” Government should be “more open” about winning battle against terrorism

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

Trackback this post  |  Subscribe to the comments via RSS Feed

Follow us on Twitter!

July 2009
« Jun   Aug »

%d bloggers like this: