MPs claim sentencing is “not intelligent, appropriate or sustainable” and suggest reform

July 4, 2009 at 2:23 pm Leave a comment

magistrates
A committee of MPs has said that unless there are changes to sentencing guidelines there will continue to be a lack of confidence in the criminal justice system.

The Commons Justice Committee has produced a report on the issue.

The current sentencing policy risks being driven by a “misconception of what people want” which is “not intelligent, appropriate or sustainable” the committee said.

There is “a lack of clarity from the outset of sentencing policy-making.”

The committee said the five aims of sentencing set out in the Criminal Justice Act 2003 are neither internally coherent, prioritised nor consistently applied.

“As a result the public, criminal justice organisations, victims, sentencers and the Government all have different expectations as to what sentencing is trying to achieve, which,  the Committee says, means that “someone, inevitably, will be disappointed.”

It is also concerned that, all too often, “political debates about sentencing descend into a counter-productive competition as to who can appear toughest on crime, measured by sentence length.”

The Committee states that the focus on sentence length in public debate will continue to damage public confidence unless ways can be found of  “combining within a sentence a clear signal as to the seriousness of the offence and a rational assessment of how effective the sentence will be in preventing further crimes.”

The Committee is currently conducting an inquiry, Justice Reinvestment, into how the finite resources available to deliver sentencing could be used to best effect to reduce re-offending and prevent the creation of further victims of crime.

The existing Sentencing Guidelines Council is under a duty to take account of the costs of different sentences and their relative effectiveness in preventing re-offending.

The proposed new council will be under further duties to publish guideline impact assessments and information on factors likely to affect prison, probation and youth justice resources.

These tasks, however, are bedevilled by a lack of reliable data and the Committee urges the Government to ensure structures and resources for effective data collection and analysis are in put in place.

Sir Alan Beith, Chair of the Committee, said: “The basic principles of sentencing laid out in the Criminal Justice Act 2003 are not consistent with each other and there is no clarity as to the primary goals of sentencing: nor do sentencers have the information to determine what works to prevent further crime.

“Media reports and opinion polls constantly tell us that people want longer custodial sentences. However, when asked about the appropriate sentence in specific cases, and given all the facts, people actually support sentencing at or below present practice.

“Sentencing policy should not be determined on the presumption that the public regard longer custodial sentences as more effective.

“Public confidence would be better served by ensuring, and then demonstrating, that sentencing is effective in preventing people from being victims of crime in the future.

“Pursuing a policy of sending more people to jail for longer is based on the misguided conception that it will increase public confidence in sentencing when in fact, paradoxically, it will only divert resources from the measures needed to prevent more crime, and therefore more  people becoming victims of crime.”

Advertisements

Entry filed under: Committees, Commons. Tags: , , , , , , , .

MPs show little enthusiasm for Keith Vaz’s tribute to Michael Jackson Consumers doubt the domestic energy market is “genuinely competitive” claims MP

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

Trackback this post  |  Subscribe to the comments via RSS Feed


Follow us on Twitter!

July 2009
M T W T F S S
« Jun   Aug »
 12345
6789101112
13141516171819
20212223242526
2728293031  

%d bloggers like this: