MPs praise EU’s improved financial management but “difficulties remain”

June 30, 2009 at 1:06 pm Leave a comment

europeancommission
A commitee of MPs has said the European Commission has made “significant effort” over recent years to improve the financial management of the European Union.

However, the Public Accounts Committe said there remains “an unacceptably high level of error in some key budget areas.”

In 2007, Member States reported irregularities to the European Anti-Fraud Office (OLAF) totalling €1,425 million, including suspected frauds of €316 million.

An irregularity is a failure to comply with the Commission’s regulations and fraud is an irregularity committed intentionally which constitutes a criminal offence.

OLAF warned that its figures should be interpreted with caution as they depend on the timely and accurate reporting by Member States, making trends and progress in tackling irregularity and suspected fraud difficult to assess.

For the fourteenth successive year, the European Court of Auditors has not provided a positive overall Statement of Assurance on the legality and regularity of the underlying transactions.

The Court is a panel of financial experts who examine the revenue, expenditures, management, and overall efficiency of the European Union’s bureaucracy.

Edward Leigh MP, Chairman of the Committee of Public Accounts, said:

“Prominent among these unresolved difficulties is the persistent high level of error in some key budget areas.

“This has led to what should be an exceptional audit procedure, qualification of the accounts, being applied for fourteen years in a row.

“A major factor leading to error is the inherent complexity of programme expenditure in some areas.

“The only solution is to simplify the rules, not – as the Commission has proposed – to tolerate higher levels of error in the more complex areas of expenditure.

“That would weaken the accountability of EU funds.”

Mr Leigh said that published figures on levels of fraud and irregularity in the European budget are “pretty useless” because there is no consistent arrangement between Member States for recording and reporting these figures.

In March 2009 the committee visited the European Commission, the European Court of Auditors and the European Anti-Fraud Office to discuss financial management and examine progress made since its last visit in March 2005.

In 2007, European Union expenditure totalled €114.0 billion and revenue was €117.6 billion.

In that year, the United Kingdom’s net contribution was €6.1 billion, the highest after Germany.

The sums involved “emphasise the need for sound financial management and control within European Union Institutions and the Member States,” the committee said.

For the first time the Court did provide a positive Statement of Assurance on the reliability of the accounts because the accounts accurately recorded the underlying transactions.

But for the 14th successive year, the European Court of Auditors did not provide a clear audit opinion (known as a Statement of Assurance) on the legality and regularity of expenditure.

It found that an unacceptably high level of the account’s underlying transactions did not comply with the rules and regulations.

The committee said the lack of a clear opinion year on year significantly damages the Union’s reputation for financial management and action urgently needs to be taken.

The Court considers errors as material if in total they exceed 2% of total expenditure in each of the main policy areas.

A Commission paper, published in December 2008, suggested different levels of error might be tolerable within different policy areas.

It proposed that the more complex the policy, the higher the level of error that would be tolerated as there comes a point where the costs of control required exceed the value of the likely errors prevented.

The Public Accounts Committee expressed concerned about such a proposal because it would remove the incentive to simplify the rules for the European expenditure regimes which is essential to improve financial management.

The fundamental review of the European Union budget, currently underway, “offers the Commission the opportunity to modernise the budget and strengthen its financial management.”

The committee concluded:

“If the Commission does not take this opportunity, a positive Statement of Assurance is extremely unlikely and European Union citizens will continue to think that their funds are badly managed.”

Advertisements

Entry filed under: Committees, Commons. Tags: , , , , , , , , , .

New job vacancies ‘filled by migrant workers’ claims former minister Petition on bullying in the Armed Forces presented to the Commons

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

Trackback this post  |  Subscribe to the comments via RSS Feed


Follow us on Twitter!


%d bloggers like this: